In September 2024, a laboratory report confirming animal fats—including alleged traces of beef and fish oil—in the sacred prasadam laddus of Tirupati Balaji sent shockwaves across India. For millions of devotees, the news was not merely a quality lapse; it represented a profound breach of trust. Yet the Tirupati incident is only one high-profile example of a far deeper and more pervasive problem: food adulteration has become systemic in India, touching virtually every staple consumed daily by its 1.4 billion citizens.
As we move through 2025, evidence continues to mount that a significant proportion of food available in Indian markets fails basic safety standards. From milk and paneer to spices, ghee, oils and even fruits and vegetables, adulteration is no longer an occasional scandal—it is an industry in itself, driven by profit, enabled by weak enforcement and tolerated by a regulatory framework that has not kept pace with the scale of the challenge.
The Scale of the Problem
According to data compiled by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and various state food departments between 2023 and mid-2025, the failure rates remain alarming:
- Over 80 per cent of paneer samples tested in multiple states failed to meet safety parameters; around 40 per cent were deemed outright unsafe for consumption.
- Approximately 25–30 per cent of milk samples continue to show adulteration with detergents, urea, starch, white paint or water.
- Spices routinely contain non-permitted colourants, brick dust, charcoal powder, mineral oils and excessive pesticide residues. In 2024–25 several consignments of Indian chilli powder, turmeric and mixed spices were rejected by the European Union, Singapore, and the United States because of ethylene oxide and aflatoxin contamination.
- Edible oils frequently contain cheaper palm olein or recycled frying oil that has been chemically bleached and re-packaged.
The economic incentive is stark. Synthetic or adulterated paneer can be produced at less than half the cost of genuine milk-based paneer. Fake ghee made from vegetable oils and essence costs roughly ₹180–220 per kilogram to manufacture yet sells for ₹500–650. Milk diluted with urea and detergent can be produced for as little as ₹6–8 per litre and sold at ₹50 or more in urban areas.
Health Consequences
The public-health impact is severe and long-term. Chronic exposure to trans fats, heavy metals (lead chromate in turmeric, copper sulphate on vegetables), carcinogens (ethylene oxide in spices) and industrial chemicals contributes to:
- Rising incidence of gastrointestinal disorders
- Liver and kidney damage
- Increased cancer risk
- Developmental issues in children
- Widespread micronutrient deficiencies despite apparent caloric sufficiency
A 2024 Lancet study placed India second globally for deaths attributable to poor diet, with adulteration exacerbating an already nutrient-deficient food basket. The Global Hunger Index 2025 ranks India 112th out of 125 countries, underscoring that hunger in India is increasingly a problem of quality rather than just quantity.
Institutional and Regulatory Shortcomings
Despite the Food Safety and Standards Act of 2006, enforcement remains the weakest link. Key systemic issues in 2025 include:
1. Acute shortage of Food Safety Officers (FSOs)
As of the latest available figures, India has roughly 2,500–3,000 FSOs for more than 1.3 crore food business operators, including millions of street vendors. Many states report vacancy rates of 50–90 per cent.
2. Inadequate laboratory infrastructure
Only about 220 laboratories (government and private combined) are NABL-accredited for food testing across the entire country. Several states, including Andhra Pradesh, still lack a single functional state-level food laboratory and must send samples to neighbouring states.
3. Low conviction rates and lenient penalties
Conviction rates under the FSS Act hover between 10 and 20 per cent in most states, and in some years have dipped below 5 per cent. Maximum fines remain capped at ₹10 lakh, with imprisonment only in cases of grievous injury or death—penalties widely regarded as insufficient deterrents for multi-crore adulteration syndicates.
4. Legal loopholes and poor prosecution quality
Even when raids uncover adulterated stocks, cases frequently collapse because samples were collected or tested by non-notified laboratories, a problem highlighted in the 2015 Maggi noodles controversy that ultimately saw the ban overturned on technical grounds.
The Political-Economy Nexus
Large-scale adulteration cannot thrive without protection. Investigations in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Tamil Nadu have repeatedly uncovered political patronage and bribery networks that shield major adulterators. Small vendors may operate out of survival, but the organised syndicates that supply fake milk, ghee and spices across state borders require logistics, finance and official blindness—resources that only political cover can reliably provide.
International Repercussions
India’s reputation as a food exporter has taken successive blows. In 2024–25:
- The EU placed over 500 Indian food items on its high-risk list.
- The US FDA issued import alerts on Indian shrimp, spices and basmati rice.
- Several Middle Eastern countries tightened scrutiny of Indian dairy and confectionery.
Agricultural exports, which touched US$50 billion in 2022–23, stagnated or declined in real terms in subsequent years, partly because importing countries no longer trust Indian safety certifications.
What Needs to Change: A Multi-Pronged Reform Agenda
Reforming India’s food safety ecosystem requires action at governmental, industry and citizen levels.
Government and Regulatory Reforms
1. Massive expansion of manpower and infrastructure
Fill all sanctioned FSO posts within 24 months and create at least 15,000 new positions. Simultaneously establish at least one state-of-the-art food-testing laboratory in every district by 2030.
2. Amend the FSS Act
Introduce graded penalties proportionate to turnover and repeat offences, with mandatory jail terms for adulteration involving carcinogens or life-threatening substances. Bring corporate directors within the ambit of personal liability.
3. Fast-track adjudication
Establish dedicated food-safety courts in every state to clear the current backlog and ensure convictions within six months of chargesheeting.
4. Leverage technology
Deploy mobile testing vans, blockchain-based traceability for high-risk commodities (milk, spices, organic products) and AI-enabled surveillance of online and wholesale markets.
5. Harmonise with global best practice
Adopt transparency standards similar to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), publishing real-time data on inspections, failures and enforcement actions.
Industry Responsibility
Reputable manufacturers and retailers must move beyond compliance to leadership:
- Invest in supply-chain transparency and third-party audits.
- Support small vendors through training and fair-price procurement rather than exploiting them as cheap raw-material sources.
- Voluntarily display QR codes linking to batch-wise test certificates.
Citizen and Consumer Action
While systemic reform is essential, individuals can protect themselves and exert pressure:
- Read labels carefully and check for FSSAI licence numbers.
- Prefer packaged goods from companies that publish test reports.
- Perform simple home tests (e.g., iodine for starch in milk, hydrochloric acid for synthetic colours in spices) promoted under FSSAI’s DART (Detect Adulteration with Rapid Test) programme.
- Report suspected adulteration via the Food Safety Connect app or state helplines and amplify genuine cases on social media.
A Question of National Ethics
Food adulteration is not merely a regulatory failure; it is a moral one. When profit consistently trumps the basic human right to safe nourishment, the social contract frays. The Tirupati laddu episode was painful precisely because temples are among the last institutions Indians believe should be corrupted. Yet if even the house of God is not safe, citizens understandably ask what remains sacred in public life.
India aspires to be a global economic power and a Vishwa Guru. No nation, however, can claim moral or material leadership while knowingly allowing a significant share of its children to consume detergent-laced milk, lead-contaminated turmeric and recycled oil sold as premium ghee.
The crisis is grave, but it is not insoluble. With political will, institutional overhaul and sustained public pressure, India can transform its food-safety ecosystem within a decade. The alternative—continuing on the present trajectory—means condemning another generation to preventable illness, stunted potential and a lingering sense that even the most basic necessities cannot be trusted.
Safe food is not a luxury; it is the foundation of public health, economic productivity and national dignity. In 2025, reclaiming that foundation must become a non-negotiable priority for government, industry and every citizen who believes India deserves better.
Post a Comment