Mahabharata—the very name conjures up images of a massive war, divine intervention, moral dilemmas, and extraordinary characters. It is not just an epic, but an integral part of Indian culture. But the question arises: is it a true story, or a complete fantasy? In this post, we will try to find the answer to this question, arranging the information provided in chronological order. We will start with the period of composition of the Mahabharata, then discuss historical sources, archaeological evidence, and modern controversies.
Period of Composition and Traditional Views of the Mahabharata
The Mahabharata was written between the 8th and 2nd centuries BCE, although its main parts are older. It is a compiled book that evolved over centuries. In the traditional Hindu perspective, the Mahabharata is seen as a 'kshetra' or sacred history, which combines divine intervention, epic battles, and moral teachings. Sections such as the Bhagavad Gita are considered spiritual revelations. From a literary and linguistic perspective, it is a long epic, reflecting the language, ideology, and social concerns of different eras. From a historical and archaeological perspective, scholars ask which parts contain historical truth—such as political conflicts, migrations, and aristocratic warfare—while the supernatural events and accounts of specific battles are literary constructions.
The Mahabharata preserves the memory of ancient South Asia, but it is not a simple historical document. It is a mixture of history, mythology, ritual, philosophy, and political theory. Traditionally, it has been called 'history', which means 'as it happened'. The words 'myth' and 'history' have been used in ancient times to categorise ancient and recent events. If it were just poetry or fiction, it would have been called 'epic' or 'tale'.
Historical Authenticity vs Mythical Elements
Which parts of the Mahabharata are historical and which are mythological? Possible historical origins include memories of conflicts between early Iron Age kingdoms in northwestern and northern India. The names of rivers, cities, tribes, and social institutions match archaeological and textual evidence. Social developments such as the horse-drawn chariot aristocracy, caste formation, and rituals are consistent with the material culture of the first millennium BCE.
On the other hand, mythological and literary additions include supernatural events such as divine weapons, cosmic intervention, and the chronology of a specific 18-day war. Many characters and plot elements have been elaborated, inserted, or reconstructed by poets and editors. It is not a pure documentary history, but rather historical memories embedded in myth, theology, and literary elaboration.
For example, the description of Kali Yuga in the Mahabharata is strangely consistent with modern life, written thousands of years ago. Krishna's words are relevant to life today. Is this fiction? Probably not, because many of the similarities and circumstances are insufficient to call it fiction.
Reasons for Lack of Definitive Evidence
Why is it impossible to find definitive evidence for the Mahabharata? It was transmitted orally and in written form in a compiled form; separating later inventions from the 'original' authenticity is inherently interpretive. Direct archaeological evidence is scant: the battles leave little trace for millennia; habitations are seen at the proposed sites of Kurukshetra or Hastinapura, but not the stage of any specific epic battle. Mythological chronology and cosmology: The chronological framing of the text uses cyclical cosmic time and lineages that do not correspond to modern historical dating methods.
The compiled circulation and sparse direct archaeology make this challenging. Traces of the battles disappear over the millennia following the battles.
Archaeological Evidence
Modern archaeology supports the authenticity of the Mahabharata. Marine archaeological excavations off the coast of Dwarka in Gujarat have uncovered a completely submerged city, complete with massive fort walls, piers, wharves and jetties, as described in the Mahabharata and other Vedic texts. The Sanskrit verse from the Mausala Parva describes the sinking of Dwarka in the sea: "After all the people had departed, the sea flooded Dwarka, which was still full of all kinds of wealth. The land that was crossed over, the sea immediately submerged it in its waters."
Archaeological evidence has been found at more than 35 sites in northern India that are identified as ancient cities described in the Mahabharata. Copper vessels, iron, seals, gold and silver ornaments, terracotta discs and painted grey earthenware have been found. Scientific dating of these artefacts is consistent with the non-Aryan-invasion model.
Hastinapur is in Uttar Pradesh, Indraprastha is in present-day Delhi, Dwarka is on the coast of Gujarat, Gandhara is in Afghanistan, and Angadesh is in Bihar. These places are real, and the Mahabharata refers to the Indian subcontinent as 'Bharat'.
Excavations around Kurukshetra have found iron arrows and spears dating back to 3000 BCE. The remains of the Laksagriha, mentioned in the Mahabharata, have been found in the village of Barnawa.
Astronomical Evidence
Astronomical references in the Mahabharata help in determining the date. A solar eclipse occurred on the 14th day of the war. Computer software studies show that a lunar eclipse occurred on the first day of the war, which occurred on the full moon. Dr B. N. Narahari Achar supports this theory. A solar eclipse occurred 13 days later, which is associated with Jayadratha's death. Krishna deceived Jayadratha with the knowledge of the solar eclipse.
The date of the war is determined by these eclipse pairs. Analysis of the eclipses that occurred at Kurukshetra reveals six pairs: 3129 BCE, 2599 BCE, etc. This is evidence of the Mahabharata war.
The Udyogya Parva states that just before the war, Krishna went to Hastinapura, in the month of Kartik, in the Revati constellation. On the way, he rested at a tree on the day when the moon was in the Bharani constellation. On the day of Duryodhana's rejection, the moon was in the Pushya constellation. Krishna left Hastinapura when the moon had not reached the constellation Uttara Phalguni. Karna bid him farewell and described the planetary positions, which indicated bad omens. Vyasa described these planetary positions in 16 verses.
The Greek historian Megasthenes states that Chandragupta Maurya was the 138th king in the lineage of Krishna. This confirms the existence of Krishna and the events of the Mahabharata.
Advanced Civilisation and Technology
The Mahabharata describes an advanced ancient civilisation, with weapons like the Brahmastra, which is as powerful as modern nuclear weapons, and technologies like cloning, surrogacy, and telepathy. It is hard to imagine that such a civilisation existed so long ago. But like Alexander the Great, who has no archaeological evidence but is history, so is the Mahabharata. All of Alexander's knowledge comes from three historians—Strabo, Arrian, and Plutarch—who lived 150–400 years after his death.
Other unexplained structures include the Great Sphinx of Giza, which is said to have been built around 2500 BC, but Dr Robert Schock's research suggests that it is older than 6000 BC, due to erosion caused by heavy rains, which did not occur until after 6000 BC. Stonehenge is also from 2400 BC, with 70-ton stones lifted 30 feet high and fixed together. Researchers such as Graham Hancock suggest that there was an advanced global civilisation 12,000 years ago, which was destroyed by a global flood.
In 10900 BC, a comet hit the Earth, which was the Younger Dryas event. This caused temperatures to rise, the ice caps melted, sea levels rose, and a global flood occurred. Animals in North America became extinct at the same time. In 2008, a tooth was found in Denisova Cave, which belonged to a Denisovan. Their DNA has been found in people from Southeast Asia. A 30,000-year-old bracelet has a 1 mm hole, made with a high-speed drill. This shows that there was a technology unknown in ancient times, perhaps described in the Mahabharata.
Genetic and Other Evidence
A 2015 genetic study suggests that the Mahabharata War caused a 'genetic earthquake', creating a bottleneck in the Y chromosome, which is seen in Central Asia and Europe millennia later, due to migration from India.
The genealogies of the Ramayana and Mahabharata match. If the two epics were written at different times, why would everything match? The Mahabharata is later than the Ramayana.
The name of the country, Bharat, comes from King Bharat (son of Dushyanta and Shakuntala). No novel names a country after a hero!
European researchers say that Aryan tribes came to India in 1500 BC. But how did they create Sanskrit, acquire knowledge and write books before 700 BC? Lokmanya Tilak, Sri Aurobindo, and Dayananda Saraswati reject this theory.
The Maurya, Gupta and Indo-Greek dynasties are recorded in the Puranas, which were accepted as written by Greek historians. What about the dynasties that preceded the Greek historians?
The Mahabharata describes flying aircraft and nuclear warfare. Sanskrit scholars did not understand these until the first atomic bomb was dropped on Japan. "The Gurkhas, flying in swift and powerful aircraft, fired a single projectile charged with the energy of the universe. A brilliant pillar of smoke and fire, as bright as ten thousand suns, rose in all its glory."
Oppenheimer, architect of the Manhattan Project, was asked what it felt like to detonate the first atomic bomb on Earth. He said, "Not the first atomic bomb, but the first atomic bomb in modern times." He believed that nuclear weapons were used in ancient India.
Einstein said on Gandhi's 70th birthday, "Future generations will believe that such a man walked this earth in flesh and blood." Our minds are limited; we consider unseen things as fiction. Mahabharata is 'history', meaning 'thus happened'. Krishna lived in India 5000 years ago. The weapons used in Kurukshetra are mantra-based. But we don't believe because we haven't seen. We believe modern scientists, but not sages.
Controversy and Sceptical Views
Some say that the Mahabharata is a great epic written by Vyasa Muni, but not a true story. It mentions Dwarka, Hastinapur, and Kurukshetra, but says that the writers mentioned present cities. For example, the movie 'Kalia' mentions the Central Jail in Nashik, which is real. If people get it after a few centuries, will they say Kalia is true?
The Gita is part of the Mahabharata, in which Krishna gives advice to Arjuna. Is it possible that it was written intact after a thousand years? 5000 years ago, there was the Indus Valley Civilisation, and even today, we have not been able to decode their language. Krishna had 16,108 wives and 10 children each, that is 1,61,080 children. 9 billion soldiers as dowry in marriage with Nagnajiti. Today, the world population is 7.5 billion. The Mahabharata needs to be decoded.
Sceptics say Why do we ask this question? There is a lot of evidence for the Mahabharata and Ramayana, but sceptics deny it. Foreign invaders have tried to erase our cultural heritage. But there is evidence:
- The war began on a full moon, which caused a lunar eclipse. The solar eclipse occurred 13 days later. The calculation gives 3102 BC.
- Jayadratha died on the day of the solar eclipse. Krishna covered the sun with a chakra to create a sunset.
- The remains of Dwarka have been found under the sea.
- Iron arrows and spears have been found in Kurukshetra.
- The remains of Lakshri have been found in Barnawa.
Satellite images of Ram Setu are available. Our culture is our identity. Science cannot explain many things, but they exist.
Date Controversy: 5561 BC vs 3067 BC
The date is disputed. Some say 5561 BCE, others 3067 BCE. 3067 BCE proves all 14 major astronomical parameters of the Mahabharata, while 5561 BCE fails every other. The 3067 BCE date, proposed by B.N. Narahari Achar, is cited as satisfying 14 major astronomical parameters of the Mahabharata, including specific planetary positions and eclipses. The 5561 BCE date, proposed by Nilesh Oak, relies primarily on the Arundhati-Vasistha (AV) observation, which Oak claims makes any date after 4508 BCE impossible. Critics argue this date falls in the Mesolithic/Neolithic period, which lacks the iron weapons and chariots described in the text.
The Maga Shukla Ashtami verses set the limit at 3200 BCE. The Mahabharata cannot have occurred after 3000 BCE because Gautama Buddha was born in 1807 BCE. The Magha Shukla Ashtami verses, associated with Bhishma’s death (Bhishma Ashtami), are used to set a chronological limit of approximately 3200 BCE for the event. This aligns with tradition, stating the war occurred shortly before the start of the Kali Yuga.
While mainstream academic consensus places Buddha’s birth around 563 BCE, alternative chronologies based on Puranic king lists place his birth in 1887 BCE and his death in 1807 BCE. If the 1807 BCE death date is accepted, the Mahabharata (occurring ~1100–1200 years prior according to Puranic lineages) would necessarily be dated before 3000 BCE.
Indus Valley sites show bullock-drawn carts, not horse-drawn chariots, from 3300–3000 BCE. This rejects the 3200 BCE date. The Rigveda is bull-centric, horses marginal. Indus Valley sites from 3300–3000 BCE predominantly show bullock-drawn carts. True horse-drawn war chariots are not widely evidenced in the archaeological record of this region until approximately 2000–1800 BCE (e.g., the Sanauli chariot). The early Rigveda is frequently described as bull-centric, with the horse becoming central only in later periods (post-2600 BCE), which aligns with the technological shift from carts to war chariots.
Genetic dips from 10,000 to 4000 BP, showing extensive wars. Research has identified genetic "dips" or shifts in the Indian population between 10,000 and 4000 BP (Before Present), which some interpret as evidence of extensive conflict or major societal shifts.
The Gregorian calendar dates the Kali Yuga to 18 February 3102 BCE. According to traditional calculations (notably by Aryabhatta), the Kali Yuga began on 18 February 3102 BCE. This serves as the traditional "anchor" for the Mahabharata era.
Conclusion: A Mix of History and Mythology
The Mahabharata is neither pure history nor pure fiction. It contains historical memories embedded in mythology, theology, and literary expanse. To say the entire text is as it was written is not supported by current historical standards; to say it is entirely invented ignores social and geographical details.
As a cultural history, it is essential for reconstructing the values, legal concepts, kingship, kinship rules, and moral imagination of ancient South Asia. As a literary work, it is one of the longest epics in the world, shaping later Indian literature, acting, law, and religion. Hybrid sources for historians: Like other ancient epics (Iliad, Gilgamesh), carefully extract historical clues, support them with archaeology, inscriptions, and comparative texts.
It is a part of Indian civilisation, which refers to our past. Further research may reveal more mysteries. What are your thoughts? Comment.
Sources
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahabharata
- https://www.worldhistory.org/Mahabharata/
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357505218_The_Scientific_Dating_of_the_Mahabharat_War
- https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/mahabharata-much-older-say-asi-archaeologists/articleshow/71658119.cms
- https://veda.krishna.com/encyclopedia/warhistory.htm
- https://iskcon.quora.com/Are-there-any-proofs-in-this-earth-for-the-existence-of-Mahabharata
- https://www.snopes.com/articles/452170/mahabharata-real-myth-or-both
- https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/soul-search/mahabharata-battle-myth-or-reality/photostory/106129018.cms
- https://www.reddit.com/r/mahabharata/comments/1hbpzjb/what_are_the_strongest_evidences_that_suggest_the/
- https://www.reviewofconphil.com/index.php/journal/article/view/111/64
- https://devdutt.com/what-history-and-archaeology-tell-us-about-the-mahabharata/
- https://www.thespiritualscientist.com/are-the-mahabharata-real-or-stories/
- https://www.radhakrishnatemple.net/blog/why-did-the-mahabharat-war-take-place/
- https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mahabharata
- https://mythologymantra.com/did-the-mahabharata-really-happen/
Post a Comment