As of January 29, 2020, India's economy stands at a critical juncture, grappling with a pronounced slowdown that has prompted downward revisions in growth forecasts and sparked widespread discussions among policymakers, economists, and analysts. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), in its World Economic Outlook update released on January 20, 2020, has attributed a significant portion of the global economic deceleration to challenges in emerging markets, with India playing a notable role. Specifically, the IMF revised India's gross domestic product (GDP) growth estimate for the fiscal year 2019-20 downward to 4.8 percent, a sharp cut from earlier projections of around 7 percent. For 2020-21, the forecast stands at 5.8 percent, reflecting persistent headwinds such as subdued domestic demand, credit constraints, and structural bottlenecks.
This adjustment underscores the interplay between India's internal economic dynamics and broader global trends. The IMF's chief economist, Gita Gopinath, highlighted during the report's release that negative surprises in a few large emerging economies, particularly India, accounted for much of the 0.1 percentage point downgrade in global growth for both 2019 and 2020. While not quantifying it as precisely 80 percent—as some interpretations have suggested—the report emphasizes India's outsized influence due to its size as the world's fifth-largest economy at the time, with a nominal GDP of approximately $2.9 trillion in 2019. Factors like stressed non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), regulatory uncertainties, and a decline in private consumption have amplified these issues, contributing to a synchronized global slowdown amid U.S.-China trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainties.
The implications of this slowdown extend beyond immediate growth figures. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ambitious target of transforming India into a $5 trillion economy by 2024-25, announced in 2019, appears increasingly challenging under current trajectories. Based on IMF projections and assuming average annual growth rates hover around 5-6 percent, analysts estimate that achieving this milestone could be delayed until at least 2028-2030. This delay not only affects long-term aspirations for higher per capita income and poverty reduction but also highlights the urgency of implementing targeted reforms. With unemployment rates climbing—particularly among the youth, as per data from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) showing urban unemployment at around 8.5 percent in December 2019—the need for revival strategies is paramount. Here explores recommendations from prominent economists, drawing on their analyses to provide an educational framework for understanding potential pathways to recovery, while incorporating additional insights from contemporary reports such as the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) Economic Outlook Survey of January 2020.
At the heart of many expert analyses is the issue of faltering demand. Nobel laureate Abhijit Banerjee, who shared the 2019 Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences for his work on poverty alleviation, has emphasized that the core problem lies in reduced consumer spending power among the lower and middle-income segments. In interviews and writings around late 2019 and early 2020, Banerjee argued that injecting liquidity directly into the hands of the poor could stimulate demand and kickstart a virtuous cycle of economic activity. One mechanism he advocates is enhancing the Minimum Support Price (MSP) for agricultural crops, which would boost rural incomes and encourage spending on goods and services. Similarly, expanding the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) through increased funding and wage adjustments could provide immediate employment and income support in rural areas, where over 65 percent of India's population resides.
Banerjee's views align with broader calls for prioritizing human development to build a more resilient economy. He points out that India's labor force lags behind peers like China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh in terms of productivity and skills, largely due to underinvestment in education and healthcare. Public expenditure on education stood at about 3 percent of GDP in 2019, below the 6 percent recommended by the Kothari Commission in the 1960s, while healthcare spending was around 1.5 percent, far short of the World Health Organization's suggested 5 percent. Increasing allocations in these sectors, Banerjee suggests, would enhance human capital, making the workforce more attractive to investors and fostering long-term growth. He advises governments to temporarily set aside concerns over fiscal deficits—projected at 3.3 percent of GDP for 2019-20 under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act—and inflation, which was running at 7.35 percent consumer price index (CPI) in December 2019, to focus on demand revival. This Keynesian-inspired approach echoes historical responses to downturns, such as the U.S. New Deal in the 1930s, where public spending spurred recovery.
Complementing Banerjee's focus on demand is the perspective of Ajay Chhibber, a former World Bank chief economist and visiting scholar at George Washington University. Chhibber highlights missed opportunities arising from the U.S.-China trade war, which began escalating in 2018. As American companies sought alternatives to Chinese manufacturing hubs, nations like Vietnam and Bangladesh capitalized by attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) through competitive incentives and streamlined regulations. Vietnam saw a 30 percent surge in U.S. imports post-trade war, while Bangladesh's economy grew at over 8 percent in 2019, driven by garment exports. India, however, struggled with competitiveness issues, including high logistics costs and complex labor laws, resulting in FDI inflows of about $50 billion in 2019—respectable but below potential.
To address this, Chhibber recommends liberalizing agricultural markets and exports to unleash rural potential. India's agriculture sector, contributing 15 percent to GDP but employing nearly 45 percent of the workforce, suffers from restrictive policies like export bans on certain commodities during price spikes. Easing these could integrate farmers into global value chains. Additionally, boosting rural demand through higher spending on schemes like Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN), which provides ₹6,000 annually to small farmers, and MGNREGA would create a multiplier effect. Chhibber also advocates for a major push in tourism via initiatives like a "Swagat India" campaign to double inbound tourists from 10.5 million in 2019 to 20 million by 2030, leveraging India's cultural heritage and generating millions of jobs in hospitality and related services.
Privatization emerges as another key theme in Chhibber's recommendations. He suggests disinvesting in state-owned enterprises such as Air India, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), Shipping Corporation of India, and Cement Corporation of India to raise funds and improve efficiency. The government had already set a disinvestment target of ₹1.05 lakh crore for 2019-20, but actual realizations were lower due to market conditions. Focusing on 8-10 priority industries, including automobiles and pharmaceuticals—where India holds a global edge in generic drugs—through targeted incentives could drive exports and innovation.
Among the most comprehensive sets of suggestions comes from Raghuram Rajan, former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). In a January 13, 2020, interview with CNBC, Rajan critiqued the centralized decision-making structure, where the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) often micromanages policies, leading to inefficiencies. He advocates for decentralization, empowering ministers and bureaucrats with decision-making authority to streamline governance. This would involve appointing competent individuals to key positions and fostering an environment where expert advice is welcomed without political biases.
On taxation, Rajan stresses the need for stability in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, introduced in 2017. Frequent rate changes—such as adjustments in December 2019—create uncertainty for businesses, deterring investments. A consistent tax framework, he argues, is essential for attracting FDI. In the telecom sector, which faced turmoil with the Supreme Court's October 2019 ruling on adjusted gross revenue (AGR) dues amounting to ₹92,000 crore, Rajan urges maintaining competition to prevent monopolies or duopolies, ensuring affordable services and innovation. Companies like Vodafone Idea were under severe stress, potentially leading to market consolidation around Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel.
Land acquisition and labor reforms are pivotal in Rajan's blueprint. The Land Acquisition Act of 2013, while protective of farmers, has made processes cumbersome, delaying infrastructure projects. Simplifying procedures with transparency could accelerate initiatives under the ₹100 lakh crore National Infrastructure Pipeline announced in December 2019. For labor, Rajan proposes flexible contracts beyond the binary of permanent or short-term employment. Introducing intermediate options with better worker protections could encourage skill development, as firms invest in training knowing employees will stay longer. This addresses the skills gap, where only 2.3 percent of India's workforce had formal vocational training in 2019, compared to 96 percent in South Korea.
Echoing Banerjee, Rajan calls for increased investments in education and healthcare to build human capital. He also emphasizes regulatory enhancements in environmental standards, food safety, and quality control to create a trustworthy ecosystem for investors. On demand, Rajan cautions against broad tax cuts, suggesting they might lead to higher savings rather than spending amid economic uncertainty. Instead, targeted infrastructure investments in rural areas—such as roads, irrigation, and digital connectivity—could generate immediate jobs and boost consumption. In a December 2019 India Today article, Rajan expanded on sector-specific reforms, including easing entry barriers in finance and tourism to foster competition and consumer benefits.
Rajeev Dubey, editor of Business Today, reinforces the centrality of consumption in revival efforts. In early 2020 analyses, he posited that India's economy, 55 percent driven by private consumption, requires a trifecta of measures: simplifying GST by incorporating fuel and alcohol (excluded as of 2020, leading to revenue losses), streamlining the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) for faster resolutions—average resolution time was 394 days in 2019—and easing FDI norms. Dubey also highlights judicial delays, with over 33 million cases pending in courts, as a barrier to business confidence. Improving the ease of doing business nationwide, beyond Delhi and Mumbai (where India ranked 63rd in the World Bank's 2020 report), is crucial.
Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, in January 2020 statements, outlined a five-point plan echoing these themes: rationalizing GST, reviving demand through consumption incentives, fixing labor-intensive sectors like textiles and construction, attracting private investment via policy certainty, and exploring export opportunities in areas like electronics amid global supply chain shifts.
Business and policy analyst Yatish Rajawat, writing for The Economic Times, prioritizes tax reductions in the lowest income slabs (below ₹5 lakh, taxed at 5 percent in 2020) to increase disposable income and spending. He suggests quarterly GST filings for small firms with turnover under ₹10 crore to reduce compliance burdens. In the auto sector, hit by a 20 percent sales decline in 2019, Rajawat advocates skilling workers for electric vehicles (EVs), aligning with the government's FAME-II scheme allocating ₹10,000 crore for EV promotion.
The FICCI Economic Outlook Survey of January 2020, polling over a dozen economists, provides a collective view aligning with individual recommendations. It projects median GDP growth at 5.0 percent for 2019-20, rising to 5.5 percent in 2020-21, with inflation contained at 4.3 percent CPI. Key suggestions include relaxing fiscal deficits for rural stimulus via MGNREGA and PM-KISAN expansions, simplifying taxes, boosting non-tax revenues through asset monetization (e.g., telecom spectrum auctions raised ₹1.1 lakh crore in past years), and reinstating development finance institutions for infrastructure funding. Sectorally, enhancing manufacturing competitiveness by resolving inverted duty structures and entering trade agreements is advised.
Additional insights from a January 28, 2020, Newslaundry article outline seven pragmatic steps: avoiding protectionist tariffs to foster exports, reviving stalled projects (over ₹10 lakh crore worth in 2019), conducting asset quality reviews for NBFCs, simplifying GST to a single rate, shifting agricultural labor to construction via real estate reforms, and embracing foreign investments like Amazon's commitments.
As India approaches the Union Budget on February 1, 2020, these recommendations offer a roadmap for balancing short-term stimulus with structural changes. While challenges like the ongoing NBFC crisis—triggered by IL&FS defaults in 2018—and global uncertainties persist, implementing these could pave the way for sustainable growth. Historical precedents, such as the 1991 liberalization that averaged 6.5 percent growth in the 1990s, demonstrate the potential of bold reforms. The key lies in collaborative, evidence-based policymaking to harness India's demographic dividend and emerge stronger from the slowdown.
Post a Comment